The Finite Sample Performance of Inference Methods for Propensity Score Matching and Weighting Estimators

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, October 2018

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter: 20 X users

q&a: 2 Q&A threads

Readers on

mendeley: 65 Mendeley

So far, Altmetric has seen 22 X posts from 20 X users, with an upper bound of 81,624 followers.

RT @noah_greifer: @stephensenn Econometric estimators for PS matching have their own standard errors: https://t.co/7dPD0J9X2K Adjusting fo…

@stephensenn Econometric estimators for PS matching have their own standard errors: https://t.co/7dPD0J9X2K Adjusting for the propensity score estimation is not necessary for valid inference after matching: https://t.co/TAVjhK6dd0

@EpiEllie @AdanBecerraPhD @f2harrell @AllenDowney Abadie and Spiess (2019) show that the post-matching cluster bootstrap is valid, even though it seems to treat the pairs as fixed: https://t.co/cKIn6ZK5dZ Accounting for estimation of the PS can be anti…

RT @noah_greifer: @PHuenermund @MetzgerGeorg Also, for matching with replacement, Hill & Reiter (2006)[https://t.co/j4vDJpsVhY] and Bodory…

This page shows the most recent X posts that mention this research output. Click here to find out how to access more activity, including 18 additional X posts.