↓ Skip to main content

KPNB1 mediates PER/CRY nuclear translocation and circadian clock function

Overview of attention for article published in eLife, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
KPNB1 mediates PER/CRY nuclear translocation and circadian clock function
Published in
eLife, August 2015
DOI 10.7554/elife.08647
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Regulated nuclear translocation of the PER/CRY repressor complex is critical for negative feedback regulation of the circadian clock of mammals. However, the precise molecular mechanism is not fully understood. Here, we report that KPNB1, an importin β component of the ncRNA repressor of NFAT (NRON) ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complex, mediates nuclear translocation and repressor function of the PER/CRY complex. RNAi depletion of KPNB1 trapped the PER/CRY complex in cytoplasm by blocking nuclear entry of PER proteins in human cells. KPNB1 interacted mainly with PER proteins and directed PER/CRY nuclear transport in circadian fashion. Interestingly, KPNB1 regulated the PER/CRY nuclear entry and repressor function, independently of importin α, its classical partner. Moreover, inducible inhibition of the conserved Drosophila importin β in lateral neurons abolished behavioral rhythms in flies. Collectively, these data show that KPNB1 is required for timely nuclear import of PER/CRY in the negative feedback regulation of circadian clock.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Sweden 1 1%
Unknown 83 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 21%
Researcher 14 16%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Student > Master 6 7%
Professor 4 5%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 25 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 30 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 18%
Neuroscience 4 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 27 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2016.
All research outputs
#18,431,369
of 29,701,924 outputs
Outputs from eLife
#14,247
of 18,006 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#149,503
of 283,886 outputs
Outputs of similar age from eLife
#207
of 263 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,701,924 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 18,006 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.4. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,886 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 263 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.