↓ Skip to main content

Inflammasomes in stroke: a triggering role for acid‐sensing ion channels

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Inflammasomes in stroke: a triggering role for acid‐sensing ion channels
Published in
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, June 2018
DOI 10.1111/nyas.13852
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Stroke is devastating and a major cause of morbidity and mortality around the world. The innate immune response plays an important role in various brain injuries, including stroke, and targeting it for therapeutic interventions would likely prove beneficial. The panoply of inflammatory cells, which induce various cellular, hormonal, and biochemical alterations, mediates the rapid progression of injury in stroke. The inflammasome, a multiprotein oligomer and a key component of specific innate immune responses, contributes toward the worsening of stroke outcomes by activating inflammatory cytokines. Acidotoxicity, mediated by acid-sensing ion channels (ASICs), also contributes toward exacerbating the condition. A role for ASICs in stroke, through the activation of the inflammasome, is emerging, which opens new avenues for understanding and intervening in stroke. In this review, we describe the various types of inflammasomes and their mechanisms of activation in stroke. Furthermore, therapeutic approaches targeting the inflammasome and that may be helpful in improving stroke outcome are discussed.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 11%
Researcher 2 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 7%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 14 52%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 7 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Psychology 1 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 15 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2018.
All research outputs
#7,651,978
of 34,665,430 outputs
Outputs from Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
#3,573
of 15,383 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,503
of 373,522 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
#53
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,665,430 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 77th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,383 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,522 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.