↓ Skip to main content

Pregnancy Outcomes Among U.S. Women With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal on Intellectual & Developmental Disabilities, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#28 of 340)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
6 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Pregnancy Outcomes Among U.S. Women With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities
Published in
American Journal on Intellectual & Developmental Disabilities, September 2015
DOI 10.1352/1944-7558-120.5.433
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susan L. Parish, Monika Mitra, Esther Son, Alexandra Bonardi, Paul T. Swoboda, Leah Igdalsky

Abstract

The existing research on pregnancy outcomes for women with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) is sparse. This study analyzed the 2010 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Inpatient Sample and compared deliveries among women with IDD (n = 340) to the general obstetric population. Women with IDD had longer hospital stays and were more likely to have Caesarean deliveries in contrast to other women. Rates of adverse pregnancy outcomes were elevated for women with IDD across a range of measures, including early labor, preterm birth, and preeclampsia, and their infants were more likely to have low birth weight, even after adjusting for age, race, ethnicity, and insurance type. Targeted interventions are needed to address these deleterious outcomes.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 83 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 16%
Student > Master 11 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 7%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 31 37%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 11%
Social Sciences 9 11%
Psychology 5 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 4%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 38 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2022.
All research outputs
#2,622,396
of 34,410,798 outputs
Outputs from American Journal on Intellectual & Developmental Disabilities
#28
of 340 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,552
of 301,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal on Intellectual & Developmental Disabilities
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,798 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 340 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 301,105 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.