↓ Skip to main content

Neurocognitive Changes Associated With Surgical Resection of Left and Right Temporal Lobe Glioma

Overview of attention for article published in Neurosurgery, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
guideline
2 clinical guideline sources

Readers on

mendeley
131 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Neurocognitive Changes Associated With Surgical Resection of Left and Right Temporal Lobe Glioma
Published in
Neurosurgery, November 2015
DOI 10.1227/neu.0000000000000987
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Little is known regarding the neurocognitive impact of temporal lobe tumor resection. To clarify subacute surgery-related changes in neurocognitive functioning (NCF) in patients with left (LTL) and right (RTL) temporal lobe glioma. Patients with glioma in the LTL (n = 45) or RTL (n = 19) completed comprehensive pre- and postsurgical neuropsychological assessments. NCF was analyzed with 2-way mixed design repeated-measures analysis of variance, with hemisphere (LTL or RTL) as an independent between-subjects factor and pre- and postoperative NCF as a within-subjects factor. About 60% of patients with LTL glioma and 40% with RTL lesions exhibited significant worsening on at least 1 NCF test. Domains most commonly impacted included verbal memory and executive functioning. Patients with LTL tumor showed greater decline than patients with RTL tumor on verbal memory and confrontation naming tests. Nonetheless, over one-third of patients with RTL lesions also showed verbal memory decline. In patients with temporal lobe glioma, NCF decline in the subacute postoperative period is common. As expected, patients with LTL tumor show more frequent and severe decline than patients with RTL tumor, particularly on verbally mediated measures. However, a considerable proportion of patients with RTL tumor also exhibit decline across various domains, even those typically associated with left hemisphere structures, such as verbal memory. While patients with RTL lesions may show even greater decline in visuospatial memory, this domain was not assessed. Nonetheless, neuropsychological assessment can identify acquired deficits and help facilitate early intervention in patients with temporal lobe glioma. ANOVA, analyses of varianceCOWA, Controlled Oral Word AssociationCTB Comp, Clinical Trial Battery CompositeFLAIR, fluid-attenuated inversion recoveryHVLT-R, Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-RevisedHVLT-R DR, HVLT-R delayed recallHVLT-R Rec, HVLT-R delayed recognitionHVLT-R TR, HVLT-R total recallLTL, left temporal lobeNCF, neurocognitive functioningRTL, right temporal lobeSD, standard deviationTMTA, Trail Making Test Part ATMTB, Trail Making Test Part B.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Colombia 2 2%
United States 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 126 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 11%
Other 11 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 8%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Other 24 18%
Unknown 43 33%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 26%
Psychology 23 18%
Neuroscience 19 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 44 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2025.
All research outputs
#6,492,982
of 34,492,055 outputs
Outputs from Neurosurgery
#1,323
of 7,703 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,560
of 320,850 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurosurgery
#9
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,492,055 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,703 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,850 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.