↓ Skip to main content

Exposure to hypoglycemia and risk of stroke

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
17 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
reddit
2 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Exposure to hypoglycemia and risk of stroke
Published in
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, June 2018
DOI 10.1111/nyas.13872
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

In the treatment of both type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus, maintaining a euglycemic state represents one of the key challenges. Improper dosing and administration of glucose-lowering drugs is associated with an increased risk of recurrent hypoglycemia episodes. In addition, the risk of adverse cardiovascular events in diabetic patients, particularly myocardial infarctions and strokes, is well established. Current research indicates a potential link between the baseline risk of cardio/cerebrovascular events in diabetic patients and exposure to hypoglycemia. In this review of the literature, we aim to determine if a relationship exists between recurrent hypoglycemia and adverse neurovascular events.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 69 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Researcher 6 9%
Student > Master 5 7%
Student > Postgraduate 4 6%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 33 48%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Neuroscience 3 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 36 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2025.
All research outputs
#2,284,718
of 34,451,315 outputs
Outputs from Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
#846
of 15,307 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,578
of 372,727 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
#25
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,451,315 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,307 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,727 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.