Transulnar versus transradial access for coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention: A meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials

Overview of attention for article published in Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions (Formerly Catheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis), September 2015

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter: 13 X users

guideline: 2 clinical guideline sources

Readers on

mendeley: 39 Mendeley

So far, Altmetric has seen 16 X posts from 13 X users, with an upper bound of 79,332 followers.

RT @arnoldseto: Discussing rescue option after failed right radial. Transulnar noninferior to transradial in metaanalysis. https://t.co/xC…

RT @DrMichaelLevitt: @braincutter Great case. Ulnar no more dangerous than radial in terms of access site complications (https://t.co/KRjgi…

@braincutter Great case. Ulnar no more dangerous than radial in terms of access site complications (https://t.co/KRjgiXXtDi) though a little trickier to puncture since nerve is close by. Great option for right-side cases when femoral and radial not an o…

This page shows the most recent X posts that mention this research output. Click here to find out how to access more activity, including 12 additional X posts.