↓ Skip to main content

ACCF/SCCT/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SCMR 2010 Appropriate Use Criteria for Cardiac Computed Tomography

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
guideline
3 clinical guideline sources

Readers on

mendeley
140 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
ACCF/SCCT/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SCMR 2010 Appropriate Use Criteria for Cardiac Computed Tomography
Published in
Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, November 2010
DOI 10.1016/j.jcct.2010.11.001
Pubmed ID
Authors

Allen J. Taylor, Manuel Cerqueira, John McB. Hodgson, Daniel Mark, James Min, Patrick O'Gara, Geoffrey D. Rubin, Christopher M. Kramer, Allen J. Taylor, Daniel Berman, Alan Brown, Farooq A. Chaudhry, Ricardo C. Cury, Milind Y. Desai, Andrew J. Einstein, Antoinette S. Gomes, Robert Harrington, Udo Hoffmann, Rahul Khare, John Lesser, Christopher McGann, Alan Rosenberg, Robert Schwartz, Marc Shelton, Gerald W. Smetana, Sidney C. Smith, Michael J. Wolk, Joseph M. Allen, Steven Bailey, Pamela S. Douglas, Robert C. Hendel, Christopher M. Kramer, James Min, Manesh R. Patel, Leslee Shaw, Raymond F. Stainback

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 140 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 18 13%
Researcher 18 13%
Student > Postgraduate 13 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 8%
Student > Bachelor 10 7%
Other 32 23%
Unknown 38 27%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 81 58%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Engineering 3 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 1%
Other 6 4%
Unknown 41 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2024.
All research outputs
#3,564,889
of 33,087,078 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography
#188
of 1,133 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,446
of 241,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,087,078 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,133 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,218 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.