↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Reflections and Future Directions on Extending Physical Therapist Scope of Practice to Improve Quality of Care and Preserve Health Care Resources
Published in
Physical Therapy, July 2018
DOI 10.1093/ptj/pzy080
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Health care legislation and policies in several countries have extended physical therapists' scope of practice to include the right to order and interpret imaging [radiography, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), ultrasound scans], electro-neurophysiological tests, blood and urine tests, as well as to perform joint and soft tissue injections and prescribe medications. In this report, we describe the reasons physical therapists' scope of practice has been extended in several countries. These additional competencies apply to both professional and postprofessional musculoskeletal (MSK) physical therapist education. To date, there have been evaluations of the practitioners in these new roles with respect to diagnostic accuracy, opioid usage, patient satisfaction, and the quality and cost of these new models of care. We question why legislation and implementation of these high-value models of care have been so slow within developed health care systems. The physical therapy profession should take definitive actions to address this in order to improve the MSK health of the patients we serve.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 18%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Student > Postgraduate 2 5%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 3%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 19 49%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 11 28%
Sports and Recreations 3 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 5%
Chemical Engineering 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 19 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2020.
All research outputs
#13,233,234
of 23,321,213 outputs
Outputs from Physical Therapy
#1,749
of 2,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,465
of 327,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physical Therapy
#18
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,321,213 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,628 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,675 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.