↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Envisioning successful teamwork: An exploratory qualitative study of team processes used by nursing teams in a paediatric hospital unit
Published in
Journal of Clinical Nursing, July 2018
DOI 10.1111/jocn.14558
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To explore how team processes support nursing teams in hospital units during every day work. Due to their close proximity to patients, nurses are central to the process of maintaining patient safety. Globally, changes in models of care delivery by nurses, inclusive of team nursing are being considered. This qualitative study used purposive sampling in a single hospital and participants were nurses employed to work on a paediatric unit. Data was collected using non-participant observation. Thematic analysis was used to analyse and code data to create themes. Three clear themes emerged. Theme 1:"We are a close knit team"; Behaviours building a successful team"- outlines expectations regarding how members are to behave when establishing, nurturing and managing a team. Theme 2: "Onto it"; Ways of interacting with each other" - Identifies the expected pattern of relating within the team which contribute to shared understanding and actions. Theme 3: "No point in second guessing"; Maintaining a global view of the unit" - focuses on the processes for monitoring and reporting signals that team performance is on course or breaking down and includes accepting responsibility to lead the team and team members having a widespread sensitivity to what needs to happen. Essential to successful teamwork is the interplay and mutuality of team members and team leaders. Leadership behaviours exhibited in this study provide useful insights to how informal and shared or distributed leadership of teams may be achieved. Without buy-in from team members, teams may not achieve successful desired outcomes. It is not sufficient for teams to rely on current successful outcomes, as they need to be on the look-out for new ways to ensure that they can anticipate possible risks or threats to the team before harm is done. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 12%
Other 4 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Student > Master 4 8%
Librarian 2 4%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 30 58%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 10 19%
Sports and Recreations 2 4%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 4%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 30 58%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2018.
All research outputs
#21,919,909
of 24,453,338 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Nursing
#5,011
of 5,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#292,593
of 334,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Nursing
#142
of 155 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,453,338 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,489 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,243 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 155 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.