↓ Skip to main content

Variants in genes encoding small GTPases and association with epithelial ovarian cancer susceptibility

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Variants in genes encoding small GTPases and association with epithelial ovarian cancer susceptibility
Published in
PLOS ONE, July 2018
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0197561
Pubmed ID
Authors

Madalene Earp, Jonathan P. Tyrer, Stacey J. Winham, Hui-Yi Lin, Ganna Chornokur, Joe Dennis, Katja K. H. Aben, Hoda Anton‐Culver, Natalia Antonenkova, Elisa V. Bandera, Yukie T. Bean, Matthias W. Beckmann, Line Bjorge, Natalia Bogdanova, Louise A. Brinton, Angela Brooks-Wilson, Fiona Bruinsma, Clareann H. Bunker, Ralf Butzow, Ian G. Campbell, Karen Carty, Jenny Chang-Claude, Linda S. Cook, Daniel W Cramer, Julie M. Cunningham, Cezary Cybulski, Agnieszka Dansonka-Mieszkowska, Evelyn Despierre, Jennifer A. Doherty, Thilo Dörk, Andreas du Bois, Matthias Dürst, Douglas F. Easton, Diana M. Eccles, Robert P. Edwards, Arif B. Ekici, Peter A. Fasching, Brooke L. Fridley, Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj, Graham G. Giles, Rosalind Glasspool, Marc T. Goodman, Jacek Gronwald, Philipp Harter, Alexander Hein, Florian Heitz, Michelle A. T. Hildebrandt, Peter Hillemanns, Claus K. Hogdall, Estrid Høgdall, Satoyo Hosono, Edwin S. Iversen, Anna Jakubowska, Allan Jensen, Bu-Tian Ji, Audrey Y. Jung, Beth Y. Karlan, Melissa Kellar, Lambertus A. Kiemeney, Boon Kiong Lim, Susanne K. Kjaer, Camilla Krakstad, Jolanta Kupryjanczyk, Diether Lambrechts, Sandrina Lambrechts, Nhu D. Le, Shashi Lele, Jenny Lester, Douglas A. Levine, Zheng Li, Dong Liang, Jolanta Lissowska, Karen Lu, Jan Lubinski, Lene Lundvall, Leon F. A. G. Massuger, Keitaro Matsuo, Valerie McGuire, John R. McLaughlin, Iain McNeish, Usha Menon, Roger L. Milne, Francesmary Modugno, Kirsten B. Moysich, Roberta B. Ness, Heli Nevanlinna, Kunle Odunsi, Sara H. Olson, Irene Orlow, Sandra Orsulic, James Paul, Tanja Pejovic, Liisa M. Pelttari, Jenny B. Permuth, Malcolm C. Pike, Elizabeth M. Poole, Barry Rosen, Mary Anne Rossing, Joseph H. Rothstein, Ingo B. Runnebaum, Iwona K. Rzepecka, Eva Schernhammer, Ira Schwaab, Xiao-Ou Shu, Yurii B. Shvetsov, Nadeem Siddiqui, Weiva Sieh, Honglin Song, Melissa C. Southey, Beata Spiewankiewicz, Lara Sucheston-Campbell, Ingvild L. Tangen, Soo-Hwang Teo, Kathryn L. Terry, Pamela J. Thompson, Lotte Thomsen, Shelley S. Tworoger, Anne M. van Altena, Ignace Vergote, Liv Cecilie Vestrheim Thomsen, Robert A. Vierkant, Christine S. Walsh, Shan Wang-Gohrke, Nicolas Wentzensen, Alice S. Whittemore, Kristine G. Wicklund, Lynne R. Wilkens, Yin-Ling Woo, Anna H. Wu, Xifeng Wu, Yong-Bing Xiang, Hannah Yang, Wei Zheng, Argyrios Ziogas, Alice W Lee, Celeste L. Pearce, Andrew Berchuck, Joellen M. Schildkraut, Susan J. Ramus, Alvaro N. A. Monteiro, Steven A. Narod, Thomas A. Sellers, Simon A. Gayther, Linda E. Kelemen, Georgia Chenevix-Trench, Harvey A. Risch, Paul D. P. Pharoah, Ellen L. Goode, Catherine M. Phelan

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 20%
Student > Master 4 11%
Student > Postgraduate 3 9%
Other 2 6%
Researcher 2 6%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 13 37%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 15 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2018.
All research outputs
#17,811,898
of 27,713,614 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#162,718
of 240,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#204,742
of 345,492 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,958
of 3,238 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,713,614 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 240,603 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,492 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,238 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.