↓ Skip to main content

Test Performance Characteristics of the AIR, GAD-7 and HADS-Anxiety Screening Questionnaires for Anxiety in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of the American Thoracic Society, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
25 X users

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Test Performance Characteristics of the AIR, GAD-7 and HADS-Anxiety Screening Questionnaires for Anxiety in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Published in
Annals of the American Thoracic Society, August 2018
DOI 10.1513/annalsats.201708-631oc
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Anxiety is a common co-morbidity of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) that is associated with higher morbidity and mortality. We evaluated three anxiety screening questionnaires, the Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) questionnaire, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-A), and the Anxiety Inventory for Respiratory Disease (AIR). Evaluate and compare thet test performance characteristics of 3 anxiety screening questionnaires using the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) version 7.0 as the gold standard. Individuals with COPD were recruited at 16 centers. The MINI interview and questionnaires were administered by trained research coordinators at an in-person visit and re-administered by telephone 2 to 4 weeks later. A composite score for the presence of any DSM-V anxiety disorder was computed based on the MINI as the gold standard compared to a participant screening positive on self report measures for these analyses. 220 eligible individuals with COPD were enrolled; 219 completed the study. 11% were identified as having a DSM-V anxiety disorder based upon the MINI. Elevated anxiety symptoms based on questionnaires were 38% for the AIR, 30% for the GAD-7, and 20% for the HADS-A. Area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) was highest for the GAD-7 (0.78, 95%CI 0.69-0.87), followed by the HADS-A (0.74, 95%CI 0.64-0.84) and the AIR (0.66, 95%CI 0.56-0.76). AUC for the GAD-7 was significantly greater than for the AIR (P=0.014). Sensitivity was not statistically different among the questionnaires: 77% for the GAD-7; 63% for the HADS-A; and 66% for the AIR. The HADS-A had the highest specificity, 85%, which was significantly higher than the GAD-7 (77%, P<0.001) and the AIR (65%, P<0.001); the GAD-7 specificity was higher than the AIR (P<0.001). Symptoms of anxiety among COPD patients as identified by screening questionnaires were common and significantly higher than the prevalence of anxiety disorder meeting by DSM-V criteria. The GAD-7, the HADS and the AIR questionnaires had fair to moderate psychometric properties as screening tools for anxiety in individuals with COPD, indicating the need for improved measures for this patient population.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 84 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 11%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Researcher 6 7%
Other 4 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 14 17%
Unknown 40 48%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 18%
Psychology 9 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 7%
Computer Science 2 2%
Sports and Recreations 2 2%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 43 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2018.
All research outputs
#3,191,174
of 31,701,846 outputs
Outputs from Annals of the American Thoracic Society
#781
of 3,614 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,877
of 359,601 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of the American Thoracic Society
#35
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,701,846 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,614 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,601 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.