↓ Skip to main content

Crystal structures of a double-barrelled fluoride ion channel

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
15 X users
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
155 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Crystal structures of a double-barrelled fluoride ion channel
Published in
Nature, September 2015
DOI 10.1038/nature14981
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To contend with hazards posed by environmental fluoride, microorganisms export this anion through F(-)-specific ion channels of the Fluc family. Since the recent discovery of Fluc channels, numerous idiosyncratic features of these proteins have been unearthed, including strong selectivity for F(-) over Cl(-) and dual-topology dimeric assembly. To understand the chemical basis for F(-) permeation and how the antiparallel subunits convene to form a F(-)-selective pore, here we solve the crystal structures of two bacterial Fluc homologues in complex with three different monobody inhibitors, with and without F(-) present, to a maximum resolution of 2.1 Å. The structures reveal a surprising 'double-barrelled' channel architecture in which two F(-) ion pathways span the membrane, and the dual-topology arrangement includes a centrally coordinated cation, most likely Na(+). F(-) selectivity is proposed to arise from the very narrow pores and an unusual anion coordination that exploits the quadrupolar edges of conserved phenylalanine rings.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
United Kingdom 3 2%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 148 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 23%
Researcher 27 17%
Student > Bachelor 26 17%
Student > Master 19 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 18 12%
Unknown 21 14%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 46 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 43 28%
Chemistry 24 15%
Neuroscience 2 1%
Engineering 2 1%
Other 12 8%
Unknown 26 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 80. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2026.
All research outputs
#657,426
of 32,871,687 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#26,867
of 115,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,859
of 296,061 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#420
of 980 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,871,687 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 115,246 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 96.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 296,061 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 980 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.