↓ Skip to main content

Predator Free 2050: A flawed conservation policy displaces higher priorities and better, evidence‐based alternatives

Overview of attention for article published in Conservation Letters, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
16 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
135 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Predator Free 2050: A flawed conservation policy displaces higher priorities and better, evidence‐based alternatives
Published in
Conservation Letters, July 2018
DOI 10.1111/conl.12593
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 135 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 13%
Student > Master 16 12%
Student > Bachelor 15 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 10%
Other 7 5%
Other 13 10%
Unknown 54 40%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 20%
Environmental Science 27 20%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 4%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 1%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 57 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,317,373
of 32,322,253 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Letters
#389
of 1,192 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,548
of 359,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Letters
#16
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,322,253 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,192 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 51.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,393 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.