↓ Skip to main content

Quantifying the unquantifiable: why Hymenoptera, not Coleoptera, is the most speciose animal order

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#5 of 434)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
14 news outlets
blogs
6 blogs
twitter
88 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
9 Wikipedia pages
reddit
25 Redditors
video
1 YouTube creator
bluesky
8 Bluesky users
podcasts
2 podcasts

Readers on

mendeley
373 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Quantifying the unquantifiable: why Hymenoptera, not Coleoptera, is the most speciose animal order
Published in
BMC Ecology, July 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12898-018-0176-x
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We challenge the oft-repeated claim that the beetles (Coleoptera) are the most species-rich order of animals. Instead, we assert that another order of insects, the Hymenoptera, is more speciose, due in large part to the massively diverse but relatively poorly known parasitoid wasps. The idea that the beetles have more species than other orders is primarily based on their respective collection histories and the relative availability of taxonomic resources, which both disfavor parasitoid wasps. Though it is unreasonable to directly compare numbers of described species in each order, the ecology of parasitic wasps-specifically, their intimate interactions with their hosts-allows for estimation of relative richness. We present a simple logical model that shows how the specialization of many parasitic wasps on their hosts suggests few scenarios in which there would be more beetle species than parasitic wasp species. We couple this model with an accounting of what we call the "genus-specific parasitoid-host ratio" from four well-studied genera of insect hosts, a metric by which to generate extremely conservative estimates of the average number of parasitic wasp species attacking a given beetle or other insect host species. Synthesis of our model with data from real host systems suggests that the Hymenoptera may have 2.5-3.2× more species than the Coleoptera. While there are more described species of beetles than all other animals, the Hymenoptera are almost certainly the larger order.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 88 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 373 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 373 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 64 17%
Student > Master 55 15%
Researcher 42 11%
Student > Bachelor 41 11%
Student > Postgraduate 12 3%
Other 39 10%
Unknown 120 32%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 164 44%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 30 8%
Environmental Science 23 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 <1%
Chemistry 3 <1%
Other 19 5%
Unknown 131 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 224. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2026.
All research outputs
#212,092
of 33,924,920 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology
#5
of 434 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,577
of 369,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,924,920 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 434 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,168 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them