↓ Skip to main content

Perceptual Changes in Response to Two Regimens of Interval Training in Sedentary Women

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Perceptual Changes in Response to Two Regimens of Interval Training in Sedentary Women
Published in
Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, April 2016
DOI 10.1519/jsc.0000000000001175
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

This study examined acute and chronic changes in perceptual measures (rating of perceived exertion (RPE), affect, and arousal) in response to two regimens of high intensity interval training (HIIT). Twenty three healthy sedentary women (mean ± SD age and VO2max = 23.0 ± 5.7 yr and 30.1 ± 4.4 mL.kg.-1.min-1, respectively) were randomized to complete 12 wks of one of two HIIT regimes, while an additional seven women served as sedentary controls. Training was performed 3 d.wk-1 on a cycle ergometer and consisted of up to ten 1 min bouts at moderate (60 - 80 %Wmax = MOD) or more intense (80 - 90 %Wmax = HI) workloads separated by active recovery. At baseline and every 3 wks, RPE, affect, and arousal were measured during training using validated scales. Repeated measures analysis of variance was used to examine acute and chronic changes in these variables to HIIT. Data revealed significant (p < 0.001) increases in RPE and arousal and decreases (p < 0.001) in affect during acute HIIT, with RPE responses differing (p < 0.05) between HI and MOD. However, acute changes in affect and arousal were similar in HI and MOD. Training led to a significant reduction in RPE; whereas, both affect and arousal were unchanged (p > 0.05) after HIIT. Completion of moderate or more intense interval training reduces perceptions of RPE during training, yet does not alter arousal or affect. RPE was reduced via training, yet large dependence upon anaerobic metabolism during HIIT may minimize training-induced changes in affect.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 70 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 23%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Student > Master 8 11%
Other 4 6%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 3 4%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 21 30%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 24 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Arts and Humanities 2 3%
Psychology 2 3%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 22 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2015.
All research outputs
#28,602,152
of 34,361,833 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research
#6,691
of 7,364 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#263,870
of 338,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research
#104
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,361,833 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,364 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.3. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,441 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.