↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Third-party reimbursement for generic prescription drugs: The prevalence of below-cost reimbursement in an environment of maximum allowable cost–based reimbursement
Published in
Journal of the American Pharmaceutical Association, May 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.japh.2018.04.018
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To examine average prescription gross margin (GM) for prescriptions and to evaluate the prevalence of below-cost reimbursement for generic prescriptions across different third-party payers and therapeutic categories. A retrospective descriptive study using 2015 dispensing data from a single independently owned pharmacy in Iowa. To calculate GM, the pharmacy's actual acquisition cost was subtracted from the third-party reimbursement rate for each generic prescription. The frequency of negative GMs was calculated for the top 6 plans and the top 10 therapeutic categories by prescription volume. A single, independently owned community pharmacy in Iowa. Prescription dispensing records for the pharmacy's largest private and public payers by prescription volume. Gross margins were calculated on a payer and United States Pharmacopeia (USP) medication category level. GM for generic prescriptions reimbursed under cost for specific payers and USP medication categories. The 2015 prescription volume for the study pharmacy was 70,866 prescriptions, of which 88% were generic. For all prescriptions, the mean GM was $6.63 per prescription, and the median GM was $3.49 per prescription. Generic medications had a mean GM of $4.66 (median, $2.86), and brand name medications had a mean GM of $21.83 (median, $16.15). The percentage of generic prescriptions paid below acquisition cost was 15.1% overall and ranged from 4.1% for Iowa Medicaid to 25.9% for one of the private payers. The most common USP medication category by prescription volume was cardiovascular agents, representing 25.2% of generic prescriptions. For the 10.9% of these prescriptions reimbursed below cost, the mean GM was -$6.80. The 2 USP medication categories with the largest negative mean GM for generic prescriptions were analgesics and anticonvulsants, with mean GMs of -$10.10 and -$11.30, respectively. The current maximum allowable cost-based reimbursement system often results in inadequate payment for generic prescription drugs. The amount of underpayment varies substantially by payer and therapeutic class.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 16%
Researcher 4 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Student > Master 3 12%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 6 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 8%
Social Sciences 2 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 8%
Other 7 28%
Unknown 8 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2023.
All research outputs
#11,463,648
of 34,376,207 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Pharmaceutical Association
#967
of 2,205 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,673
of 375,031 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Pharmaceutical Association
#21
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,376,207 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 65th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,205 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 375,031 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.