Recently, cell-based therapy has attracted attention for treatment of central nervous system (CNS) disorders. Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) are considered to have good engraftment potential. Therefore, more efficient and less invasive methods to obtain donor cells are required. Here, we established human BMSCs from cranial bone waste (cBMSCs) obtained following routine neurosurgical procedures. cBMSCs and cells obtained from the iliac crest (iBMSCs, standard BMSCs) showed expression of cell surface markers associated with mesenchymal stem cells and multipotency traits such as differentiation into osteogenic and adipogenic lineages. cBMSCs showed higher expression of the neural crest-associated mRNAs p75, Slug, and Snail than iBMSCs. Neurogenic induced cells from cBMSCs expressed the neural markers nestin, Pax6, neurofilament (NF)-L, and NF-M as seen with RT-PCR, and NF-M protein as seen with western blotting at higher levels than cells from iBMSCs. Immunostaining showed a significantly greater proportion of NF-M-positive cells in the population of induced cBMSCs compared with the population of iBMSCs. Thus, cBMSCs showed a greater tendency to differentiate into neuron-like cells than iBMSCs.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2020.
All research outputs
#9,770,120
of 33,351,181 outputs
Outputs from Neuroscience Letters
#2,662
of 9,227 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,091
of 296,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuroscience Letters
#25
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,351,181 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,227 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 296,499 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
