↓ Skip to main content

SURVEY ON PAST DAMAGE RECO RDS OF WATERPOWER PLANS AND INVESTIGATION ON ES TIMATION METHODOLOGY OF SOCIAL IMPACTS CAUSED BY THE OVERFLOW WATER

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. F4 (Construction and Management), January 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
SURVEY ON PAST DAMAGE RECO RDS OF WATERPOWER PLANS AND INVESTIGATION ON ES TIMATION METHODOLOGY OF SOCIAL IMPACTS CAUSED BY THE OVERFLOW WATER
Published in
Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. F4 (Construction and Management), January 2011
DOI 10.2208/jscejcm.67.1
Authors

Yoshio KAJITANI, Kosuke YAMAMOTO, Yasushi TOYODA, Masato NAKAJIMA

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2018.
All research outputs
#17,286,379
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. F4 (Construction and Management)
#7
of 13 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,802
of 190,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. F4 (Construction and Management)
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.7. This one scored the same or higher as 6 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,479 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.