↓ Skip to main content

Update in the Early Management and Reperfusion Strategies of Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care Research & Practice, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Update in the Early Management and Reperfusion Strategies of Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke
Published in
Critical Care Research & Practice, June 2018
DOI 10.1155/2018/9168731
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) remains a leading cause of death and long-term disability. The paradigms on prehospital care, reperfusion therapies, and postreperfusion management of patients with AIS continue to evolve. After the publication of pivotal clinical trials, endovascular thrombectomy has become part of the standard of care in selected cases of AIS since 2015. New stroke guidelines have been recently published, and the time window for mechanical thrombectomy has now been extended up to 24 hours. This review aims to provide a focused up-to-date review for the early management of adult patients with AIS and introduce the new upcoming areas of ongoing research.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 86 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 10 12%
Researcher 9 10%
Student > Postgraduate 8 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 7%
Student > Master 6 7%
Other 20 23%
Unknown 27 31%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 34%
Neuroscience 13 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 32 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2018.
All research outputs
#31,228,352
of 34,411,289 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care Research & Practice
#217
of 246 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#336,193
of 374,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care Research & Practice
#6
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,411,289 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 246 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 374,466 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.