↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Evaluation of serum and ocular levels of membrane attack complex and C-reactive protein in CFH-genotyped human donors
Published in
Eye, July 2018
DOI 10.1038/s41433-018-0170-8
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

There is a considerable body of evidence demonstrating a link between the membrane attack complex (MAC) and age-related macular degeneration (AMD), and between C-reactive protein (CRP) and AMD. Both the MAC and the monomeric form of CRP (mCRP) accumulate within the choriocapillaris in AMD. However, the precise contribution of these species to AMD pathophysiology has not been fully elucidated. We sought to directly assess CRP and MAC levels between human serum and ocular tissues from the same CFH Y402H genotyped donors using ELISA of serum and RPE/choroid proteins. The Y402H polymorphism was associated with significantly increased MAC in RPE/choroid samples, but not in the serum, in a previously unstudied cohort. While MAC levels in the choroid were independent of circulating levels, choroidal CRP was correlated to serum levels. These data provide further evidence for local activation of complement within the choriocapillaris in AMD.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 18%
Student > Master 3 18%
Other 2 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 12%
Other 2 12%
Unknown 2 12%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 12%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 2 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2018.
All research outputs
#16,267,236
of 23,968,814 outputs
Outputs from Eye
#2,899
of 4,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#212,492
of 330,077 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Eye
#46
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,968,814 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,411 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,077 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.