↓ Skip to main content

A Case Series and Literature Review

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A Case Series and Literature Review
Published in
Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine, May 2020
DOI 10.1097/jsm.0000000000000614
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To present a case series of 14 isolated traumatic first rib fractures sustained in sport and review the literature on clinical presentation, mechanism of injury, diagnosis, and management of sport-related traumatic first rib fractures. We compiled a series of isolated traumatic first rib fractures seen in 2 Division 1-associated sports medicine clinics. We also performed a literature search for additional publications of isolated traumatic first rib fractures in sport. Patients in our case series were all evaluated and treated at 2 tertiary care center sports medicine clinics. Patients were those who sustained isolated traumatic first rib fracture during sport. None. None. None. Traumatic fracture of the first rib in sport is certainly not a common diagnosis, but it is likely more widespread than sports medicine providers realize. Considering the diagnosis of first rib fracture for athletes with shoulder pain after trauma is essential for identifying this injury. Although more study is likely needed to make definitive recommendations on treatment and return to play protocols, the case series and literature review presented suggests that rehabilitation and return to play when the patient is asymptomatic may be appropriate care.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 23%
Student > Master 6 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Student > Postgraduate 1 3%
Unknown 15 48%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 5 16%
Sports and Recreations 5 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 6%
Psychology 1 3%
Chemistry 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 16 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2023.
All research outputs
#8,190,103
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine
#1,059
of 1,810 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#165,325
of 410,104 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine
#12
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,810 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.5. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 410,104 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.