↓ Skip to main content

Aromatherapy Positively Affects Mood, Eeg Patterns of Alertness and Math Computations

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Neuroscience, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#6 of 1,649)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
21 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
9 X users
patent
10 patents
facebook
11 Facebook pages
googleplus
5 Google+ users
reddit
2 Redditors
video
2 YouTube creators

Readers on

mendeley
296 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Aromatherapy Positively Affects Mood, Eeg Patterns of Alertness and Math Computations
Published in
International Journal of Neuroscience, July 2009
DOI 10.3109/00207459808986469
Pubmed ID
Authors

Miguel A. Diego, Nancy Aaron Jones, Tiffany Field, Maria Hernandez-reif, Saul Schanberg, Cynthia Kuhn, Mary Galamaga, Virginia McAdam, Robert Galamaga

Abstract

EEG activity, alertness, and mood were assessed in 40 adults given 3 minutes of aromatherapy using two aromas, lavender (considered a relaxing odor) or rosemary (considered a stimulating odor). Participants were also given simple math computations before and after the therapy. The lavender group showed increased beta power, suggesting increased drowsiness, they had less depressed mood (POMS) and reported feeling more relaxed and performed the math computations faster and more accurately following aromatherapy. The rosemary group, on the other hand, showed decreased frontal alpha and beta power, suggesting increased alertness. They also had lower state anxiety scores, reported feeling more relaxed and alert and they were only faster, not more accurate, at completing the math computations after the aromatherapy session.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 296 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 292 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 42 14%
Student > Bachelor 39 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 10%
Researcher 29 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 5%
Other 41 14%
Unknown 101 34%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 45 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 6%
Neuroscience 18 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 5%
Other 70 24%
Unknown 108 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 194. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2024.
All research outputs
#254,156
of 34,089,221 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Neuroscience
#6
of 1,649 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#563
of 171,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Neuroscience
#4
of 558 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,089,221 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,649 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,827 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 558 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.