↓ Skip to main content

Central Nervous System Infections Associated with Immunosuppressive Therapy for Rheumatic Disease

Overview of attention for article published in Rheumatic Disease Clinics of North America, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Central Nervous System Infections Associated with Immunosuppressive Therapy for Rheumatic Disease
Published in
Rheumatic Disease Clinics of North America, August 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.rdc.2017.06.009
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Patients on immunosuppressive therapy for rheumatic diseases are at increased risk of infection. Although infections of the central nervous system (CNS) are less common compared with other sites, patients on broadly immunosuppressive and biologic immunomodulatory agents may be susceptible to more severe, disseminated forms of infection, including of the CNS. Certain key principles regarding infection risk apply across immunosuppressive therapies, including increased risk with higher doses and longer duration of therapy and with combination therapy. Providers should be aware of the CNS infection risk related to immunosuppressant use to help guide best practices for screening and prophylaxis.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 13%
Student > Master 6 13%
Other 5 11%
Researcher 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 13 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Neuroscience 2 4%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 17 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2018.
All research outputs
#31,228,352
of 34,411,289 outputs
Outputs from Rheumatic Disease Clinics of North America
#760
of 820 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#319,975
of 356,334 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Rheumatic Disease Clinics of North America
#10
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,411,289 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 820 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,334 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.