↓ Skip to main content

The Use of E-Learning in Medical Education for Mountain Rescuers Concerning Hypothermia

Overview of attention for article published in High Altitude Medicine & Biology, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The Use of E-Learning in Medical Education for Mountain Rescuers Concerning Hypothermia
Published in
High Altitude Medicine & Biology, July 2018
DOI 10.1089/ham.2018.0050
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Podsiadło, Paweł, Sylweriusz Kosiński, Tomasz Darocha, Kinga Sałapa, Tomasz Sanak, and Hermann Brugger. The use of e-learning in medical education for mountain rescuers concerning hypothermia. High Alt Med Biol 00:000-000, 2018. Victims of mountain accidents are often exposed to wet and cold environments which may increase the risk of hypothermia. Mountain rescuers should be able to recognize and manage hypothermia. We aimed to assess relevant knowledge in professional and volunteer mountain rescuers, as well as to evaluate the efficacy of an e-learning platform for continuing medical education. An e-learning platform was developed to provide access to updated information about hypothermia. Volunteer and professional mountain rescuers participated in an e-learning course. Pretest, post-test, and specific lesson test scores were compared. After 1 year, a follow-up course was performed. In total, 187 rescuers, comprising 136 (72.7%) volunteers and 51 (27.3%) professionals, were enrolled. Ahead of the course, no difference in knowledge was found between professionals and volunteers. After the course, one's knowledge of hypothermia increased significantly (p < 0.001). The scores achieved in the field management of hypothermia were better among professional rescuers than among volunteer rescuers (p = 0.003), whereas in post-traumatic hypothermia half of the results were insufficient in both groups. Moreover, 57 rescuers repeated the course after 12 months. While professionals partially retained the achieved level of knowledge, the volunteers had dropped back to their initial level. The e-learning course increased the knowledge of hypothermia among mountain rescuers. The poor retention after 1 year indicates that the interval between lectures should be reduced. An e-learning platform is an effective tool for the medical education of mountain rescuers.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 77 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Other 6 8%
Researcher 6 8%
Student > Master 4 5%
Lecturer 3 4%
Other 13 17%
Unknown 38 49%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Psychology 2 3%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 40 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2026.
All research outputs
#10,834,017
of 33,159,331 outputs
Outputs from High Altitude Medicine & Biology
#201
of 733 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137,566
of 362,518 outputs
Outputs of similar age from High Altitude Medicine & Biology
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,159,331 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 733 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,518 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.