↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Decoding the Rich Biological Properties of Noble Gases: How Well Can We Predict Noble Gas Binding to Diverse Proteins?
Published in
ChemMedChem, August 2018
DOI 10.1002/cmdc.201800434
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The chemically inert noble gases display a surprisingly rich spectrum of useful biological properties. Relatively little is known about molecular mechanisms behind these effects. It is clearly not feasible to conduct large numbers of pharmacological experiments on noble gases to identify activity. Computational studies of binding of noble gases and proteins can address this paucity of information and provide insight into mechanisms of action. We employed bespoke computational grid calculations to predict the positions of energy minima in the interactions of noble gases with diverse proteins. The method was validated by quantifying how well simulations could predict binding positions in 131 diverse protein x-ray structures containing 399 Xe and Kr atoms. We found excellent agreement between calculated and experimental binding positions of noble gases. 94% of all crystallographic xenon atoms were within 1 Xe VdW diameter of a predicted binding site and 97% lay within 2 VdW diameters. 100% of crystallographic krypton atoms were within 1 Kr VdW diameter of a predicted binding site. We showed feasibility of large scale computational screening of all ~60,000 unique structures in the Protein Data Bank. This will elucidate biochemical mechanisms by which these novel 'atomic drugs' elicit their valuable biochemical properties and identify new medical uses.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 33%
Researcher 2 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 17%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Professor 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 17%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 6 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 8%
Physics and Astronomy 1 8%
Design 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2018.
All research outputs
#19,900,901
of 24,453,338 outputs
Outputs from ChemMedChem
#2,742
of 3,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#259,654
of 335,183 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ChemMedChem
#69
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,453,338 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,485 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,183 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.