↓ Skip to main content

The IS1111 insertion sequence used for detection of Coxiella burnetii is widespread in Coxiella-like endosymbionts of ticks

Overview of attention for article published in FEMS Microbiology Letters, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The IS1111 insertion sequence used for detection of Coxiella burnetii is widespread in Coxiella-like endosymbionts of ticks
Published in
FEMS Microbiology Letters, August 2015
DOI 10.1093/femsle/fnv132
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Coxiella is a genus of obligate intracellular bacteria engaged in a variety of interactions with eukaryotes. The type species, Coxiella burnetii, infects several vertebrate species, including humans, and is the causative agent of Q fever. Multiple copies of a specific transposable element, the insertion sequence IS1111, are present in the genome of C. burnetii and are routinely used for confirmation of Q fever cases. Recently, many Coxiella-like bacteria that are closely related but genetically distinct to C. burnetii have been found in ticks. These Coxiella-like bacteria are maternally inherited endosymbionts, present at high prevalence in tick populations and engaged in mutualistic interactions with their arthropod hosts. In this study, the presence of IS1111 was examined in the Coxiella-like endosymbionts and in bacteria of the Coxiella sister-genus, Rickettsiella. This screening reveals that a wide range of IS1111 copies were present in the Coxiella-like endosymbionts of ticks. DNA sequencing further identified genetically divergent IS1111 copies, including degraded copies that constitute an important genomic fossil record of past IS1111 expansions. These results show that IS1111 is not specific to C. burnetii, suggesting that Q fever detection assays based only on this element may lead to misidentification with Coxiella-like endosymbionts.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 87 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 17%
Researcher 10 11%
Student > Master 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 4 5%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 33 38%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 15 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 5%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 33 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2023.
All research outputs
#6,442,648
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from FEMS Microbiology Letters
#1,425
of 5,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,632
of 276,257 outputs
Outputs of similar age from FEMS Microbiology Letters
#9
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,773 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,257 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.