Title |
Assessment of quality and interpretation of panoramic radiographs obtained in the Lao People’s Democratic Republic as part of a teleradiology collaboration with Japan
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Oral Science, January 2015
|
DOI | 10.2334/josnusd.57.235 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kunihito Matsumoto, Souksavanh Vongsa, Ichiro Nakajima, Ken-ichiro Ejima, Kiyomi Kohinata, Toshihiro Suzuki, Shigeharu Hosono, Hirofumi Aboshi, Fumiyuki Kuwata, Kichibee Otsuka |
Abstract |
As part of quality assessment of a teleradiology program we evaluated the validity of patient information received, the quality of panoramic radiography imaging in Laos, and the ability of a Laotian radiologist to detect temporomandibular joint abnormalities. The amount of patient information gathered from 2,021 scans of panoramic radiographs was evaluated by triage before image diagnosis. Among the radiographs from 2,021 patients, primary triage indicated that there was insufficient information for 794 (39.3%) patients. Secondary triage to assess imaging failure included 1,227 radiographs, four of which were excluded from imaging diagnosis because of unacceptable image flaws. In total, 2,446 joints from 1,223 radiographs were evaluated for temporomandibular joint abnormalities in order to compare the image interpretation abilities of Laotian and Japanese radiologists. The kappa coefficient was 0.836 (P < 0.01) for the agreement between the two observers in detecting temporomandibular joint abnormalities on radiographs. We conclude that additional efforts are needed in order to overcome the challenges of maintaining quality in imaging techniques and diagnoses in Laos. (J Oral Sci 57, 235-239, 2015). |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 17% |
Student > Master | 4 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
Other | 6 | 20% |
Unknown | 7 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 27% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 13% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Other | 3 | 10% |
Unknown | 12 | 40% |