↓ Skip to main content

Assessment of quality and interpretation of panoramic radiographs obtained in the Lao People’s Democratic Republic as part of a teleradiology collaboration with Japan

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Oral Science, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assessment of quality and interpretation of panoramic radiographs obtained in the Lao People’s Democratic Republic as part of a teleradiology collaboration with Japan
Published in
Journal of Oral Science, January 2015
DOI 10.2334/josnusd.57.235
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kunihito Matsumoto, Souksavanh Vongsa, Ichiro Nakajima, Ken-ichiro Ejima, Kiyomi Kohinata, Toshihiro Suzuki, Shigeharu Hosono, Hirofumi Aboshi, Fumiyuki Kuwata, Kichibee Otsuka

Abstract

As part of quality assessment of a teleradiology program we evaluated the validity of patient information received, the quality of panoramic radiography imaging in Laos, and the ability of a Laotian radiologist to detect temporomandibular joint abnormalities. The amount of patient information gathered from 2,021 scans of panoramic radiographs was evaluated by triage before image diagnosis. Among the radiographs from 2,021 patients, primary triage indicated that there was insufficient information for 794 (39.3%) patients. Secondary triage to assess imaging failure included 1,227 radiographs, four of which were excluded from imaging diagnosis because of unacceptable image flaws. In total, 2,446 joints from 1,223 radiographs were evaluated for temporomandibular joint abnormalities in order to compare the image interpretation abilities of Laotian and Japanese radiologists. The kappa coefficient was 0.836 (P < 0.01) for the agreement between the two observers in detecting temporomandibular joint abnormalities on radiographs. We conclude that additional efforts are needed in order to overcome the challenges of maintaining quality in imaging techniques and diagnoses in Laos. (J Oral Sci 57, 235-239, 2015).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 5 17%
Student > Master 4 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 10%
Student > Postgraduate 3 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Other 6 20%
Unknown 7 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 12 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2015.
All research outputs
#15,346,908
of 22,828,180 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Oral Science
#123
of 330 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,013
of 353,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Oral Science
#3
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,828,180 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 330 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,128 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.