↓ Skip to main content

PRIMARY PREVENTIVE HEALTH CARE AMONG INJECTION DRUG USERS, OTHER SUSTAINED DRUG USERS, AND NON-USERS

Overview of attention for article published in Substance Use & Misuse, June 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
PRIMARY PREVENTIVE HEALTH CARE AMONG INJECTION DRUG USERS, OTHER SUSTAINED DRUG USERS, AND NON-USERS
Published in
Substance Use & Misuse, June 2001
DOI 10.1081/ja-100104092
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The primary objective of this paper is to investigate the relationship between sustained illicit drug use and the utilization of primary preventive health care. Data from 1254 African-American, Hispanic/Latino, and non-Hispanic/Latino white men and women collected in 1996-1997 were analyzed to determine independent risk factors for the utilization of primary preventive health care that was not received as a result of seeking treatment for a specific health condition. When several demographic, health, and drug use variables were assessed in a logistic regression model, gender, ethnicity, health insurance status, drug use, and alcohol use were independently associated with primary preventive care. Women, Hispanic/Latinos, and persons who had health insurance were more likely to have received primary preventive health care while injection drug users, other sustained drug users, and "heavy" alcohol users were less likely to have used primary preventive health care services in the past year.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 10%
Researcher 4 10%
Other 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 12 31%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 26%
Social Sciences 9 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 10%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 14 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2019.
All research outputs
#5,084,216
of 29,653,920 outputs
Outputs from Substance Use & Misuse
#415
of 2,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,683
of 48,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Substance Use & Misuse
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,653,920 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 48,369 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.