↓ Skip to main content

Heterogeneous Ensemble-Based Infill Criterion for Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization of Expensive Problems

Overview of attention for article published in IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Heterogeneous Ensemble-Based Infill Criterion for Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization of Expensive Problems
Published in
IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, January 2018
DOI 10.1109/tcyb.2018.2794503
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Gaussian processes (GPs) are the most popular model used in surrogate-assisted evolutionary optimization of computationally expensive problems, mainly because GPs are able to measure the uncertainty of the estimated fitness values, based on which certain infill sampling criteria can be used to guide the search and update the surrogate model. However, the computation time for constructing GPs may become excessively long when the number of training samples increases, which makes it inappropriate to use them as surrogates in evolutionary optimization. To address this issue, this paper proposes to use ensembles as surrogates and infill criteria for model management in evolutionary optimization. A heterogeneous ensemble consisting of a least square support vector machine and two radial basis function networks is constructed to enhance the reliability of ensembles for uncertainty estimation. In addition to the original decision variables, a selected subset of the decision variables and a set of transformed variables are used as inputs of the heterogeneous ensemble to further promote the diversity of the ensemble. The proposed heterogeneous ensemble is compared with a GP and a homogeneous ensemble for infill sampling criteria in evolutionary multiobjective optimization. Experimental results demonstrate that the heterogeneous ensemble is competitive in performance compared with GPs and much more scalable in computational complexity to the increase in search dimension.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 68 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 16%
Student > Master 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Researcher 4 6%
Student > Bachelor 3 4%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 31 46%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 14 21%
Engineering 13 19%
Environmental Science 1 1%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 1%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 36 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2021.
All research outputs
#9,421,706
of 31,301,153 outputs
Outputs from IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics
#160
of 1,495 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,092
of 469,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age from IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics
#4
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,301,153 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,495 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 469,489 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.