You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cross-national variations in reported discrimination among people treated for major depression worldwide: The ASPEN/INDIGO international study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of Psychiatry, January 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1192/bjp.bp.114.156992 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Antonio Lasalvia, Tine Van Bortel, Chiara Bonetto, Geetha Jayaram, Jaap van Weeghel, Silvia Zoppei, Lee Knifton, Neil Quinn, Kristian Wahlbeck, Doriana Cristofalo, Mariangela Lanfredi, Norman Sartorius, Graham Thornicroft |
| Abstract |
BackgroundNo study has so far explored differences in discrimination reported by people with major depressive disorder (MDD) across countries and cultures.AimsTo (a) compare reported discrimination across different countries, and (b) explore the relative weight of individual and contextual factors in explaining levels of reported discrimination in people with MDD.MethodCross-sectional multisite international survey (34 countries worldwide) of 1082 people with MDD. Experienced and anticipated discrimination were assessed by the Discrimination and Stigma Scale (DISC). Countries were classified according to their rating on the Human Development Index (HDI). Multilevel negative binomial and Poisson models were used.ResultsPeople living in 'very high HDI' countries reported higher discrimination than those in 'medium/low HDI' countries. Variation in reported discrimination across countries was only partially explained by individual-level variables. The contribution of country-level variables was significant for anticipated discrimination only.ConclusionsContextual factors play an important role in anticipated discrimination. Country-specific interventions should be implemented to prevent discrimination towards people with MDD. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 2 | 18% |
| United States | 1 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
| Japan | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 6 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 73% |
| Scientists | 2 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 121 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 25 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 11% |
| Professor | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 27 | 22% |
| Unknown | 22 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 27 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 15 | 12% |
| Unknown | 37 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2019.
All research outputs
#3,495,911
of 25,932,719 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Psychiatry
#1,864
of 6,370 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,978
of 453,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Psychiatry
#1,406
of 5,325 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,932,719 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,370 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,579 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,325 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.