↓ Skip to main content

Impact and Progression of Organ Dysfunction in Patients with Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infections: A Multicenter Study

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical Infections, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Impact and Progression of Organ Dysfunction in Patients with Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infections: A Multicenter Study
Published in
Surgical Infections, September 2015
DOI 10.1089/sur.2015.098
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Necrotizing soft tissue infections (NSTI) represent a rare but devastating disease for which the systemic manifestations have been poorly characterized. In an effort to define an optimal endpoint for clinical trials in this condition, the objective of this study was to establish the pattern of organ dysfunction over time and determine the correlation between organ dysfunction and clinical outcome in patients with NSTI. We conducted a multicenter, retrospective clinical study of patients with NSTI presenting to 12 academic medical centers in the U.S. during 2013. Patients with a diagnosis of NSTI confirmed by surgical findings were included. Organ dysfunction was assessed using a modified Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score (mSOFA: excluding liver) on admission and on hospital days 1, 2, 3, 7, 10, and 14. The presence of organ dysfunction on admission and resolution of organ dysfunction were correlated with clinical parameters, including intensive care unit (ICU)-free days (of 28 d), ventilator-free days, number of debridements, and mortality rate. The incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) and recovery also were assessed. There were 198 patients enrolled, of whom 62% were male, the mean age was 51 years, and 40% had monomicrobial infections. The mean mSOFA score on admission was 2.4 ± 3.0, with 49% of the patients having a score ≥2 and 35% a score of ≥3. Patients typically demonstrated worsening of the mSOFA score over the first 24 h followed by gradual resolution. An mSOFA ≥3 at admission was associated with a significant decrease in ventilator-free days (mean 20.1 vs. 25.6 days; p < 0.001); ICU-free days (15.2 vs. 23.1, p < 0.001); more debridements (mean 2.3 vs. 2.0; p = 0.11); a higher mortality rate (15.9% vs. 3.1%; p = 0.003); and a higher rate of AKI (59.4 vs. 35.9%; p < 0.001). The persistence of organ dysfunction (mSOFA >1) among survivors at day 14 was associated with fewer ICU-free days (17.8 vs. 23.6; p < 0.001) and ventilator-free days (23.6 vs. 27; p = 0.001) and a lower recovery rate from AKI (38.7% vs. 81.3%; p < 0.001). Early development of systemic organ dysfunction in patients with NSTI is associated with higher morbidity and mortality rates. Failure of the resolution of organ dysfunction by day 14 forecasts a poor outcome. The mSOFA score may be a useful marker for patient selection for inclusion in interventional trials, and the resolution of organ dysfunction by day 14 may be an important clinical endpoint.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Russia 1 2%
Unknown 51 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 17%
Researcher 8 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 8%
Other 3 6%
Professor 3 6%
Other 9 17%
Unknown 17 32%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 49%
Psychology 2 4%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 20 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2016.
All research outputs
#19,947,956
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Infections
#575
of 815 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#194,510
of 284,412 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Infections
#12
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 815 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,412 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.