↓ Skip to main content

Virtual Dyscalculia Induced by Parietal-Lobe TMS Impairs Automatic Magnitude Processing

Overview of attention for article published in Current Biology, March 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
274 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Virtual Dyscalculia Induced by Parietal-Lobe TMS Impairs Automatic Magnitude Processing
Published in
Current Biology, March 2007
DOI 10.1016/j.cub.2007.02.056
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 274 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
Italy 5 2%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Belgium 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 258 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 61 22%
Researcher 51 19%
Student > Master 43 16%
Student > Bachelor 18 7%
Student > Postgraduate 15 5%
Other 48 18%
Unknown 38 14%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 131 48%
Neuroscience 33 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 4%
Social Sciences 9 3%
Other 17 6%
Unknown 51 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2017.
All research outputs
#9,515,738
of 27,782,313 outputs
Outputs from Current Biology
#10,212
of 15,294 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,808
of 101,422 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Biology
#53
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,782,313 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,294 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 64.5. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 101,422 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.