↓ Skip to main content

Vocal Fold Paresis: Incidence, and the Relationship between Voice Handicap Index and Laryngeal EMG Findings

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Voice, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Vocal Fold Paresis: Incidence, and the Relationship between Voice Handicap Index and Laryngeal EMG Findings
Published in
Journal of Voice, July 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.jvoice.2018.05.008
Pubmed ID
Authors

Srihari Daggumati, Haig Panossian M D, Robert T Sataloff M D D M A F A C S

Abstract

To determine whether there is a correlation between Voice Handicap Index 10 (VHI-10) and degree of vocal fold paresis as determined by laryngeal EMG. Secondary objective was to determine the incidence of vocal fold paresis in a tertiary laryngology practice. A retrospective chart review of all new voice patients seen by the senior author (RTS) from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2017. Subjects completed VHI at their initial visit. Patients were examined with flexible and rigid laryngoscopy and videostroboscopy and referred for laryngeal electromyography (LEMG) if neuromuscular weakness was suspected. LEMG was used to identify the affected nerves and to quantify subjectively the degree of paresis. Patients who did not complete LEMG and or handicap index were excluded from the correlation analysis. The prevalence of vocal fold paresis was determined by reviewing the records of each subject. The number of patients diagnosed clinically with paresis or paralysis and referred for LEMG was documented. The subjects, who had paresis confirmed on LEMG (n = 210) were grouped according to the nerves involved and by the degree of paresis. The unilateral superior laryngeal nerve and ipsilateral recurrent laryngeal nerve paresis group (n = 29) had a reasonably even distribution of patients in each sub-group (n = 11; 12; 6) and was analyzed for correlation. There was a strong positive correlation between the degree of paresis and the VHI score (r = 0.59, P < 0.001). Other groups did not have an even distribution among sub-groups and could not be to be analyzed for correlation. The senior author examined 344 new voice patients during years of 2016 and 2017. Based on laryngoscopy, 335 patients were referred for LEMG (97.4%). Two hundred thirty-seven patients had LEMG performed, and 234 patients confirmed to have vocal fold paresis were confirmed (98.7%.). The incidence of vocal fold paresis in subjects who underwent LEMG or who had normal motion during laryngoscopy was 95.1% (234 out of 246). The incidence in the 98 subjects who did not complete the recommended LEMG is unknown. The unilateral superior laryngeal nerve with ipsilateral recurrent laryngeal nerve paresis was the only group that allowed for analysis whether patient's perception of their voice problem as measured VHI-10 correlated with increasing degree of vocal fold paresis. A strong significant positive correlation in this group was identified. Additional studies with a larger patient cohort are recommended.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 15%
Researcher 6 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Lecturer 2 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 18 44%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 15%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 21 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2018.
All research outputs
#20,663,600
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Voice
#1,468
of 2,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#251,579
of 323,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Voice
#26
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,243 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,052 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.