↓ Skip to main content

Altered bone‐regulating myokine expression in skeletal muscle Of Duchenne muscular dystrophy mouse models

Overview of attention for article published in Muscle & Nerve, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Altered bone‐regulating myokine expression in skeletal muscle Of Duchenne muscular dystrophy mouse models
Published in
Muscle & Nerve, September 2018
DOI 10.1002/mus.26195
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD) has been well characterized as a disease that affects both skeletal muscle and bone. The pathophysiology responsible for the deficits in bone tissue is still unclear. qRT-PCR and western blot analyses of known myokines from skeletal muscle were performed on dystrophic mouse models and WT controls to identify differentially expressed bone-regulating myokines. 24 out of 43 myokine genes demonstrated significantly different mRNA expression in the skeletal muscles of dystrophic mice when compared with muscles of WT mice. Several differently expressed bone-regulating myokine genes were identified, and their protein levels were also verified by western blot. Dystrophic skeletal muscle demonstrated a significantly altered myokine gene expression profile. mRNA and protein levels of several bone-regulating myokines were significantly altered in dystrophic skeletal muscle, which suggests pathological role of bone-regulating myokines on bone homeostasis in DMD. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 20%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Student > Master 2 4%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 20 43%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 4%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 20 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2018.
All research outputs
#21,879,071
of 24,411,829 outputs
Outputs from Muscle & Nerve
#2,655
of 2,980 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#296,417
of 339,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Muscle & Nerve
#38
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,411,829 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,980 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,411 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.