↓ Skip to main content

UPLC-ESI-TOF MS-Based Metabolite Profiling of the Antioxidative Food Supplement Garcinia buchananii

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Agricultural & Food Chemistry, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
UPLC-ESI-TOF MS-Based Metabolite Profiling of the Antioxidative Food Supplement Garcinia buchananii
Published in
Journal of Agricultural & Food Chemistry, August 2015
DOI 10.1021/acs.jafc.5b02544
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Comparative antioxidative analyses of aqueous ethanolic extracts from leaf, root, and stem of G. buchananii revealed high activity of all three organs. To investigate the metabolites composition of the different parts of G. buchananii, an untargeted metabolomics approach using UPLC-ESI-TOF MS with simultaneous acquisition of low- and high-collision energy mass spectra (MS(e)) was performed. Unsupervised statistics (PCA) highlighted clear differences in the metabolomes of the three organs. OPLS-DA revealed (2R,3S,2''R,3''R)-GB-1, (2R,3S)-morelloflavone, and (2R,3S)-volkensiflavone as the most decisive marker compounds discriminating leaf from root and stem extract. Leaves represent the best source to isolate GB-1, morelloflavone, and volkensiflavone. Root extract is the best organ to isolate xanthones, stem bark extract the best source to isolate (2R,3S,2''R,3''R)-manniflavanone, and the identified polyisoprenylated benzophenones are characteristic compounds for the leaf organ. Morelloflavone, volkensiflavone and garcicowin C were isolated for the first time from G. buchananii and identified via MS, NMR, and CD spectroscopy and showed in H2O2 scavenging, H/L-TEAC, and H/L-ORAC assays moderate to strong in vitro antioxidative activities.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 31%
Student > Master 6 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Other 2 5%
Researcher 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 10 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 9 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 18%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 10%
Chemical Engineering 2 5%
Physics and Astronomy 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 11 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2015.
All research outputs
#24,756,754
of 34,364,397 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Agricultural & Food Chemistry
#20,566
of 25,810 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,462
of 299,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Agricultural & Food Chemistry
#122
of 192 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,364,397 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,810 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,429 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 192 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.