↓ Skip to main content

Prioritizing phylogenetic diversity captures functional diversity unreliably

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
70 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
2 Redditors
bluesky
1 Bluesky user

Readers on

mendeley
511 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Prioritizing phylogenetic diversity captures functional diversity unreliably
Published in
Nature Communications, July 2018
DOI 10.1038/s41467-018-05126-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 70 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 511 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 511 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 111 22%
Student > Master 71 14%
Researcher 64 13%
Student > Bachelor 43 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 31 6%
Other 61 12%
Unknown 130 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 207 41%
Environmental Science 99 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 1%
Engineering 5 <1%
Other 28 5%
Unknown 144 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 83. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2021.
All research outputs
#641,608
of 34,185,767 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#10,638
of 82,080 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,558
of 371,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#237
of 1,323 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,185,767 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 82,080 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 49.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,721 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,323 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.