↓ Skip to main content

Analyzing the effects of alcohol on adolescent trauma using the National Trauma Data Bank

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, The, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Analyzing the effects of alcohol on adolescent trauma using the National Trauma Data Bank
Published in
Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, The, September 2015
DOI 10.1097/ta.0000000000000777
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Alcohol misuse is an important source of preventable injuries in the adolescent population. The aim of our study was to assess the effect of alcohol in adolescent trauma outcomes. We performed a retrospective analysis of the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB). Adolescent patients (12-18 years) who were tested for alcohol were included in the analysis. Outcome measures were difference in complications and mortality between the two groups. A total of 31,923 adolescent trauma patients were tested for alcohol; 21% (n = 6,704) of whom tested positive for alcohol. Propensity-matched analysis revealed that adolescent patients with alcohol use were more likely to have adult respiratory distress syndrome (10% vs. 6%, p = 0.001), pneumonia (31% vs. 24%, p = 0.01), and thromboembolic complications (30% vs. 20%, p = 0.001) during their hospitalization. The mortality rate was higher in adolescent trauma patients who tested positive for alcohol (15% vs. 9%, p = 0.04). Alcohol use is associated with significant consequences in adolescent population. Our study highlights the increasing use of alcohol in adolescent trauma patients. Strict screening criteria in adolescent trauma patients are warranted. Epidemiologic/prognostic study, level III.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Student > Master 2 6%
Other 6 17%
Unknown 9 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 51%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 11 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2015.
All research outputs
#21,858,222
of 33,942,205 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, The
#3,771
of 5,247 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,578
of 300,599 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, The
#82
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,942,205 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,247 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,599 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.