↓ Skip to main content

High sensitivity organic inorganic hybrid X-ray detectors with direct transduction and broadband response

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
10 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
24 X users

Readers on

mendeley
168 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
High sensitivity organic inorganic hybrid X-ray detectors with direct transduction and broadband response
Published in
Nature Communications, July 2018
DOI 10.1038/s41467-018-05301-6
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

X-ray detectors are critical to healthcare diagnostics, cancer therapy and homeland security, with many potential uses limited by system cost and/or detector dimensions. Current X-ray detector sensitivities are limited by the bulk X-ray attenuation of the materials and consequently necessitate thick crystals (~1 mm-1 cm), resulting in rigid structures, high operational voltages and high cost. Here we present a disruptive, flexible, low cost, broadband, and high sensitivity direct X-ray transduction technology produced by embedding high atomic number bismuth oxide nanoparticles in an organic bulk heterojunction. These hybrid detectors demonstrate sensitivities of 1712 µC mGy-1 cm-3 for "soft" X-rays and ~30 and 58 µC mGy-1 cm-3 under 6 and 15 MV "hard" X-rays generated from a medical linear accelerator; strongly competing with the current solid state detectors, all achieved at low bias voltages (-10 V) and low power, enabling detector operation powered by coin cell batteries.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 168 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 18%
Researcher 25 15%
Student > Master 17 10%
Student > Bachelor 11 7%
Professor 7 4%
Other 21 13%
Unknown 56 33%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 34 20%
Materials Science 25 15%
Engineering 19 11%
Chemistry 13 8%
Energy 4 2%
Other 10 6%
Unknown 63 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 102. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2021.
All research outputs
#511,453
of 32,890,663 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#8,053
of 79,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,601
of 363,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#189
of 1,316 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,890,663 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 79,627 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 49.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,062 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,316 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.