↓ Skip to main content

Cis-eQTL analysis and functional validation of candidate susceptibility genes for high-grade serous ovarian cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
patent
6 patents

Readers on

mendeley
156 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Cis-eQTL analysis and functional validation of candidate susceptibility genes for high-grade serous ovarian cancer
Published in
Nature Communications, September 2015
DOI 10.1038/ncomms9234
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kate Lawrenson, Qiyuan Li, Siddhartha Kar, Ji-Heui Seo, Jonathan Tyrer, Tassja J. Spindler, Janet Lee, Yibu Chen, Alison Karst, Ronny Drapkin, Katja K. H. Aben, Hoda Anton-Culver, Natalia Antonenkova, Helen Baker, Elisa V. Bandera, Yukie Bean, Matthias W. Beckmann, Andrew Berchuck, Maria Bisogna, Line Bjorge, Natalia Bogdanova, Louise A. Brinton, Angela Brooks-Wilson, Fiona Bruinsma, Ralf Butzow, Ian G. Campbell, Karen Carty, Jenny Chang-Claude, Georgia Chenevix-Trench, Anne Chen, Zhihua Chen, Linda S. Cook, Daniel W. Cramer, Julie M. Cunningham, Cezary Cybulski, Agnieszka Dansonka-Mieszkowska, Joe Dennis, Ed Dicks, Jennifer A. Doherty, Thilo Dörk, Andreas du Bois, Matthias Dürst, Diana Eccles, Douglas T. Easton, Robert P. Edwards, Ursula Eilber, Arif B. Ekici, Peter A. Fasching, Brooke L. Fridley, Yu-Tang Gao, Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj, Graham G. Giles, Rosalind Glasspool, Ellen L. Goode, Marc T. Goodman, Jacek Grownwald, Patricia Harrington, Philipp Harter, Hanis Nazihah Hasmad, Alexander Hein, Florian Heitz, Michelle A. T. Hildebrandt, Peter Hillemanns, Estrid Hogdall, Claus Hogdall, Satoyo Hosono, Edwin S. Iversen, Anna Jakubowska, Paul James, Allan Jensen, Bu-Tian Ji, Beth Y. Karlan, Susanne Kruger Kjaer, Linda E. Kelemen, Melissa Kellar, Joseph L. Kelley, Lambertus A. Kiemeney, Camilla Krakstad, Jolanta Kupryjanczyk, Diether Lambrechts, Sandrina Lambrechts, Nhu D. Le, Alice W. Lee, Shashi Lele, Arto Leminen, Jenny Lester, Douglas A. Levine, Dong Liang, Jolanta Lissowska, Karen Lu, Jan Lubinski, Lene Lundvall, Leon F. A. G. Massuger, Keitaro Matsuo, Valerie McGuire, John R. McLaughlin, Heli Nevanlinna, Ian McNeish, Usha Menon, Francesmary Modugno, Kirsten B. Moysich, Steven A. Narod, Lotte Nedergaard, Roberta B. Ness, Mat Adenan Noor Azmi, Kunle Odunsi, Sara H. Olson, Irene Orlow, Sandra Orsulic, Rachel Palmieri Weber, Celeste L. Pearce, Tanja Pejovic, Liisa M. Pelttari, Jennifer Permuth-Wey, Catherine M. Phelan, Malcolm C. Pike, Elizabeth M. Poole, Susan J. Ramus, Harvey A. Risch, Barry Rosen, Mary Anne Rossing, Joseph H. Rothstein, Anja Rudolph, Ingo B. Runnebaum, Iwona K. Rzepecka, Helga B. Salvesen, Joellen M. Schildkraut, Ira Schwaab, Thomas A. Sellers, Xiao-Ou Shu, Yurii B. Shvetsov, Nadeem Siddiqui, Weiva Sieh, Honglin Song, Melissa C. Southey, Lara Sucheston, Ingvild L. Tangen, Soo-Hwang Teo, Kathryn L. Terry, Pamela J. Thompson, Agnieszka Timorek, Ya-Yu Tsai, Shelley S. Tworoger, Anne M. van Altena, Els Van Nieuwenhuysen, Ignace Vergote, Robert A. Vierkant, Shan Wang-Gohrke, Christine Walsh, Nicolas Wentzensen, Alice S. Whittemore, Kristine G. Wicklund, Lynne R. Wilkens, Yin-Ling Woo, Xifeng Wu, Anna H. Wu, Hannah Yang, Wei Zheng, Argyrios Ziogas, Alvaro Monteiro, Paul D. Pharoah, Simon A. Gayther, Matthew L. Freedman

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Norway 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Unknown 154 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 31 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 13%
Student > Bachelor 13 8%
Student > Master 13 8%
Other 9 6%
Other 35 22%
Unknown 35 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 40 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 2%
Engineering 3 2%
Other 15 10%
Unknown 39 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2025.
All research outputs
#9,075,023
of 34,115,020 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#55,618
of 81,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,818
of 311,997 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#522
of 773 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,115,020 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 81,834 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 49.3. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,997 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 773 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.