↓ Skip to main content

Health plan enrollees with disability informing primary care practices and providers about their quality of care: A randomized trial

Overview of attention for article published in Disability and Health Journal, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Health plan enrollees with disability informing primary care practices and providers about their quality of care: A randomized trial
Published in
Disability and Health Journal, July 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.dhjo.2018.05.006
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

In October 2013, Massachusetts initiated the One Care demonstration, which enrolls beneficiaries ages 21 to 64 dually-eligible for Medicare and Medicaid. Local disability advocates argued that persons with disability should assess their own One Care quality. To test the comparative effectiveness for improving patient-reported health care experiences of two informational interventions in a 12-month period: (1) "YESHealth: Your Experience, Speak up for better health care," in which disability advocates developed brief topical surveys and gathered information from One Care enrollees with significant physical disability or serious mental illness; and (2) the Persons with Disability Quality Survey (PDQ-S), developed collaboratively with persons with disability. This cluster randomized controlled trial randomly assigned 27 primary care practices with ≥50 One Care members to three study arms differing by information provided to practice directors and primary care providers (PCPs): (1) quarterly YESHealth reports plus results from baseline administration of PDQ-S to 720 enrollees before YESHealth implementation; (2) PDQ-S results only; and (3) no study information. We administered PDQ-S again one year later and used difference-in-differences analyses of results across the two years to assess intervention outcomes. Disability advocates conducting YESHealth reported substantial difficulties contacting practices and engaging PCPs. With few exceptions, no differences were found across the three study arms in enrollee-reported outcomes. Providing consumer-designed and generated quality information to PCPs had no measurable effect on enrollees' perceptions of One Care quality. Barriers to PCPs engaging with disability advocates could have contributed to YESHealth's failure to improve care.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 60 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 13%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Researcher 5 8%
Student > Postgraduate 4 7%
Other 12 20%
Unknown 20 33%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 12%
Social Sciences 7 12%
Psychology 4 7%
Engineering 3 5%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 23 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2018.
All research outputs
#18,722,725
of 29,353,077 outputs
Outputs from Disability and Health Journal
#655
of 942 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#201,602
of 347,896 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Disability and Health Journal
#16
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,353,077 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 942 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,896 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.