↓ Skip to main content

Assessing the Relative Performance of Nurses Using Data Envelopment Analysis Matrix (DEAM)

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical Systems, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Assessing the Relative Performance of Nurses Using Data Envelopment Analysis Matrix (DEAM)
Published in
Journal of Medical Systems, May 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10916-018-0974-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 80 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 8 10%
Student > Master 8 10%
Other 7 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 35 44%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 10 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 8%
Engineering 4 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 13 16%
Unknown 37 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2018.
All research outputs
#18,643,992
of 23,096,849 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Systems
#821
of 1,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#255,915
of 331,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Systems
#23
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,096,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,162 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,177 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.