↓ Skip to main content

Independent Photoreceptive Circadian Clocks Throughout Drosophila

Overview of attention for article published in Science, November 1997
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
9 X users

Readers on

mendeley
281 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Independent Photoreceptive Circadian Clocks Throughout Drosophila
Published in
Science, November 1997
DOI 10.1126/science.278.5343.1632
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Transgenic Drosophila that expressed either luciferase or green fluorescent protein driven from the promoter of the clock gene period were used to monitor the circadian clock in explanted head, thorax, and abdominal tissues. The tissues (including sensory bristles in the leg and wing) showed rhythmic bioluminescence, and the rhythms could be reset by light. The photoreceptive properties of the explanted tissues indicate that unidentified photoreceptors are likely to contribute to photic signal transduction to the clock. These results show that autonomous circadian oscillators are present throughout the body, and they suggest that individual cells in Drosophila are capable of supporting their own independent clocks.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 281 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 6 2%
United Kingdom 6 2%
Portugal 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 261 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 77 27%
Researcher 41 15%
Student > Bachelor 38 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 19 7%
Student > Master 17 6%
Other 40 14%
Unknown 49 17%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 115 41%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 51 18%
Neuroscience 24 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 7%
Computer Science 2 <1%
Other 14 5%
Unknown 54 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2018.
All research outputs
#2,388,264
of 34,410,315 outputs
Outputs from Science
#31,125
of 94,080 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,380
of 132,199 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#33
of 271 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,315 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 94,080 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 66.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 132,199 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 271 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.