↓ Skip to main content

Cigarette and e-cigarette dual use and risk of cardiopulmonary symptoms in the Health eHeart Study

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
298 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Cigarette and e-cigarette dual use and risk of cardiopulmonary symptoms in the Health eHeart Study
Published in
PLOS ONE, July 2018
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0198681
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 45 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 298 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 298 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 10%
Student > Bachelor 30 10%
Researcher 28 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 5%
Other 49 16%
Unknown 127 43%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 52 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 8%
Psychology 13 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 13 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 4%
Other 49 16%
Unknown 137 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 159. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2023.
All research outputs
#323,578
of 34,356,690 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#4,352
of 224,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,389
of 372,845 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#74
of 3,566 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,356,690 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,845 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,566 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.