↓ Skip to main content

Niche and movement models identify corridors of introduced feral cats infringing ecologically sensitive areas in New Zealand

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Conservation, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Readers on

mendeley
126 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Niche and movement models identify corridors of introduced feral cats infringing ecologically sensitive areas in New Zealand
Published in
Biological Conservation, December 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.09.004
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Australia 2 2%
United States 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 119 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 14%
Student > Master 18 14%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Other 7 6%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 35 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 49 39%
Environmental Science 22 17%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 5 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 8 6%
Unknown 38 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2015.
All research outputs
#8,014,685
of 27,782,313 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#4,090
of 7,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,543
of 402,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#87
of 152 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,782,313 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,136 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,215 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 152 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.