↓ Skip to main content

Validation of Quantitative HPLC Method for Bacosides in KeenMind

Overview of attention for article published in Evidence-based Complementary & Alternative Medicine (eCAM), August 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Validation of Quantitative HPLC Method for Bacosides in KeenMind
Published in
Evidence-based Complementary & Alternative Medicine (eCAM), August 2015
DOI 10.1155/2015/696172
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ashley Dowell, George Davidson, Dilip Ghosh

Abstract

Brahmi (Bacopa monnieri) has been used by Ayurvedic medical practitioners in India for almost 3000 years. The pharmacological properties of Bacopa monnieri were studied extensively and the activities were attributed mainly due to the presence of characteristic saponins called "bacosides." Bacosides are complex mixture of structurally closely related compounds, glycosides of either jujubogenin or pseudojujubogenin. The popularity of herbal medicines and increasing clinical evidence to support associated health claims require standardisation of the phytochemical actives contained in these products. However, unlike allopathic medicines which typically contain a single active compound, herbal medicines are typically complex mixtures of various phytochemicals. The assay for bacosides in the British Pharmacopoeia monograph for Bacopa monnieri exemplifies that only a subset of bacosides present are included in the calculation of total bacosides. These results in calculated bacoside values are significantly lower than those attained for the same material using more inclusive techniques such as UV spectroscopy. This study illustrates some of the problems encountered when applying chemical analysis for standardisation of herbal medicines, particularly in relation to the new method development and validation of bacosides from KeenMind.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 54 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 9%
Researcher 5 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 7%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 4%
Student > Bachelor 2 4%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 31 57%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Environmental Science 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 33 61%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2015.
All research outputs
#27,325,480
of 33,942,205 outputs
Outputs from Evidence-based Complementary & Alternative Medicine (eCAM)
#5,091
of 9,618 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#222,214
of 303,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Evidence-based Complementary & Alternative Medicine (eCAM)
#148
of 224 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,942,205 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,618 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 303,163 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 224 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.