↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
79 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
181 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Analysis of clinical benefit, harms, and cost-effectiveness of screening women for abdominal aortic aneurysm
Published in
The Lancet, July 2018
DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(18)31222-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 79 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 181 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 181 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 14%
Student > Bachelor 22 12%
Student > Master 15 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 7%
Other 11 6%
Other 27 15%
Unknown 67 37%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 70 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 4%
Engineering 6 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Other 16 9%
Unknown 72 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 78. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2023.
All research outputs
#686,821
of 34,166,863 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#5,738
of 51,751 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,252
of 372,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#112
of 357 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,166,863 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 51,751 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 63.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,511 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 357 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.