↓ Skip to main content

Parameter optimization of a computer-aided diagnosis system for detection of masses on digitized mammograms

Overview of attention for article published in Technology & Health Care, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Parameter optimization of a computer-aided diagnosis system for detection of masses on digitized mammograms
Published in
Technology & Health Care, January 2015
DOI 10.3233/thc-151034
Pubmed ID
Authors

Milos Radovic, Marina Milosevic, Srdjan Ninkovic, Nenad Filipovic, Aleksandar Peulic

Abstract

Reading mammograms is a difficult task and for this reason any development that may improve the performance in breast cancer screening is of great importance. We proposed optimized computer aided diagnosis (CAD) system, equipped with reliability estimate module, for mass detection on digitized mammograms. Proposed CAD system consists of four major steps: preprocessing, segmentation, feature extraction and classification. We propose a simple regression function as a threshold function for extraction of potential masses. By running optimization procedure we estimate parameters of the preprocessing and segmentation steps thus ensuring maximum mass detection sensitivity. In addition to the classification, where we tested seven different classifiers, the CAD system is equipped with reliability estimate module. By performing segmentation 91.3% of masses were correctly segmented with 4.14 false positives per image (FPpi). This result is improved in the classification phase where, among the seven tested classifiers, multilayer perceptron neural network achieved the best result including 77.4% sensitivity and 0.49 FPpi. By using the proposed regression function and parameter optimization we were able to improve segmentation results comparing to the literature. In addition, we showed that CAD system has high potential for being equipped with reliability estimate module.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 15%
Student > Bachelor 5 15%
Researcher 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Professor 1 3%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 13 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 21%
Computer Science 6 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Psychology 1 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 16 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2015.
All research outputs
#20,656,820
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Technology & Health Care
#294
of 462 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#266,629
of 359,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Technology & Health Care
#28
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 462 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,538 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.