Although laparoscopic robotic-assisted intracorporeal ureteral tailoring is feasible and several authors have reported doing it, it adds a level of complexity to the surgery that many robotic surgeons are uncomfortable with. Also, some techniques for tailoring the ureter, like the one described by Ossandon, would be very difficult to perform intracorporeally or violate principles of hidden incision endoscopic surgery (HIDES) by adding extra ports in visible locations.
Extracorporeal ureteral tapering is performed by extracting the ureter through a 10-mm step trocar placed in the midline at the level of the biking line. Once the ureter is tapered and a stent has been secured, the 10-mm trocar is replaced and the rest of the reimplant is performed in a way very similar to when performing a robotic apendicovesicostomy.
Extracorporeal ureteral tailoring can be added to the bag of tricks that robotic surgeons can resort to when faced with the situation of a dilated ureter without compromising cosmesis.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2015.
All research outputs
#17,286,645
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pediatric Urology
#1,839
of 2,715 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#171,294
of 286,342 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pediatric Urology
#33
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,715 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,342 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
