↓ Skip to main content

The Apgar Score

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatrics, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
61 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
11 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
1 Redditor
video
2 YouTube creators

Readers on

mendeley
1357 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The Apgar Score
Published in
Pediatrics, October 2015
DOI 10.1542/peds.2015-2651
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The Apgar score provides an accepted and convenient method for reporting the status of the newborn infant immediately after birth and the response to resuscitation if needed. The Apgar score alone cannot be considered as evidence of, or a consequence of, asphyxia; does not predict individual neonatal mortality or neurologic outcome; and should not be used for that purpose. An Apgar score assigned during resuscitation is not equivalent to a score assigned to a spontaneously breathing infant. The American Academy of Pediatrics and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists encourage use of an expanded Apgar score reporting form that accounts for concurrent resuscitative interventions.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,357 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Canada 3 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 1347 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 172 13%
Student > Master 118 9%
Student > Postgraduate 77 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 69 5%
Other 57 4%
Other 204 15%
Unknown 660 49%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 425 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 111 8%
Unspecified 24 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 1%
Engineering 16 1%
Other 86 6%
Unknown 676 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 514. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2024.
All research outputs
#62,745
of 34,307,719 outputs
Outputs from Pediatrics
#415
of 22,586 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#543
of 313,266 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatrics
#5
of 204 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,307,719 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,586 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 47.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,266 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 204 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.